SaaS Unit Economics Guide 2025: LTV, CAC & Payback Period
Measure unit economics from Stripe: calculate LTV:CAC ratio, payback period, and customer profitability. Optimize for sustainable growth.
James Whitfield
Product Analytics Consultant
James helps SaaS companies leverage product analytics to improve retention and drive feature adoption through data-driven insights.
Unit economics determine whether your SaaS business creates or destroys value with each customer. A company growing 100% year-over-year can still be fundamentally broken if each customer costs more to acquire and serve than they generate in lifetime revenue. The core question unit economics answers: Do you make money on each customer, and how quickly? For SaaS businesses, this translates to metrics like Customer Lifetime Value (LTV), Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), LTV:CAC ratio, and payback period. Investors, board members, and strategic planners scrutinize these metrics because they reveal whether growth is sustainable or merely buying revenue at a loss. Stripe data is foundational to unit economics calculation—revenue, churn, expansion all flow through your billing system. Yet most companies calculate these metrics incorrectly, using oversimplified formulas that produce misleading results. This comprehensive guide covers rigorous unit economics calculation, common pitfalls to avoid, segmented analysis for actionable insights, and optimization strategies that improve your fundamental business model. You'll learn to build unit economics frameworks that reveal truth about your business and guide strategic decisions.
Understanding Core Unit Economics Metrics
Customer Lifetime Value (LTV)
LTV estimates the total revenue (or profit) a customer generates over their entire relationship. **Basic formula**: LTV = ARPU × Customer Lifetime (months). **Customer lifetime**: Typically calculated as 1 / monthly churn rate. If monthly churn is 2%, lifetime = 50 months. **ARPU**: Average Revenue Per User per month. More sophisticated calculations: **Gross margin-adjusted LTV**: LTV = ARPU × Gross Margin % × Lifetime. This reflects actual profit, not just revenue. **Cohort-based LTV**: Track actual revenue from customer cohorts over time rather than estimating. More accurate but requires historical data. **Segment-specific LTV**: Calculate separately for SMB, mid-market, enterprise—aggregate LTV obscures segment differences. Warning: Simple LTV formulas assume constant ARPU and churn, which rarely hold. LTV is an estimate, not a measurement—track actual cohort performance to validate projections.
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)
CAC measures the total cost to acquire one customer. **Basic formula**: CAC = Total Sales & Marketing Spend / New Customers Acquired. Include all acquisition costs: **Marketing**: Paid ads, content, events, sponsorships, tools, marketing team salaries. **Sales**: Sales team salaries, commissions, tools, travel, sales operations. **Onboarding**: Customer success resources spent on new customer activation (sometimes included, sometimes separate). Period alignment: Calculate CAC over consistent periods (monthly, quarterly) that match your sales cycle. Fast-cycle businesses might use monthly; enterprise with long sales cycles might use quarterly. Blended vs segmented CAC: Aggregate CAC hides efficiency differences. Calculate separately for: channels (organic vs paid), segments (SMB vs enterprise), and sales motions (self-serve vs sales-assisted). CAC payback starts from first payment, so track the full acquisition investment that preceded that payment.
LTV:CAC Ratio
LTV:CAC ratio indicates how much value you create relative to acquisition cost. **Calculation**: LTV:CAC = Customer Lifetime Value / Customer Acquisition Cost. **Benchmarks**: <1:1 = Losing money on every customer. 1:1 to 3:1 = Possibly sustainable but tight margins. 3:1 = General target—healthy unit economics. >5:1 = Either very efficient or under-investing in growth. Interpretation nuance: **Too low** = unsustainable, need to improve retention or reduce CAC. **Target range** = healthy, can invest in growth. **Too high** = may be leaving growth on the table by under-investing in acquisition. Context matters: Early-stage companies may have lower ratios as they find product-market fit. Mature companies should maintain 3:1+. Enterprise segments may justify lower ratios due to higher switching costs and expansion potential.
CAC Payback Period
CAC payback measures how quickly acquisition costs are recovered. **Basic formula**: CAC Payback = CAC / (ARPU × Gross Margin). Result is in months. **Benchmark targets**: <12 months = Excellent, fast capital efficiency. 12-18 months = Good, typical for SaaS. 18-24 months = Acceptable for enterprise. >24 months = Concerning unless very high LTV. Why payback matters: Short payback means faster reinvestment of capital into growth. Long payback ties up capital, requires external funding, and increases risk if customers churn before payback. **Payback vs LTV:CAC trade-off**: A 5:1 LTV:CAC with 36-month payback may be worse than 3:1 with 12-month payback depending on capital availability and risk tolerance. **Segment variation**: Enterprise payback is typically longer (higher CAC, higher ARPU but longer sales cycle). SMB should be shorter (lower CAC, faster close).
The 3:1 Rule Context
The often-cited "3:1 LTV:CAC" benchmark assumes gross margin-adjusted LTV. If your calculation uses revenue LTV (not gross margin adjusted), you need higher ratios to be sustainable. Also, 3:1 is a minimum threshold, not a target—top performers achieve 5:1 or higher while still investing appropriately in growth.
Calculating LTV from Stripe Data
Revenue Data from Stripe
Pull comprehensive revenue data for LTV calculation. Key Stripe data points: **Subscription revenue**: customer.subscription.created, invoice.paid events with subscription line items. **One-time charges**: Non-subscription invoices, setup fees, overages. **Expansion revenue**: Subscription upgrades via subscription.updated events with plan changes. **Contraction**: Downgrades tracked the same way. **Net revenue per customer per month**: Sum all revenue types, subtract refunds/credits. Build customer revenue timeline: For each customer, construct monthly revenue from first payment through current date (or churn). This becomes input to LTV calculation. Handle complexities: Multi-currency (normalize to base currency), prorations (attribute to appropriate periods), annual payments (amortize monthly for analysis).
Churn and Retention for Lifetime
Customer lifetime depends on churn/retention rates. **Monthly churn rate**: Customers churned in month / customers at start of month. **Churn calculation from Stripe**: Track subscription cancellations (customer.subscription.deleted) relative to active subscriptions. **Lifetime formula**: Lifetime = 1 / monthly churn rate. Example: 2% monthly churn = 50-month lifetime. **Cohort retention curves**: More accurate than churn rate—track actual retention month-over-month for customer cohorts. Early months typically have higher churn; mature customers stabilize. **Segment-specific churn**: Churn varies dramatically by segment. SMB might be 5%, enterprise 1%. Using blended churn produces inaccurate LTV for both. Important: Churn rates change over time. Historical churn may not predict future churn. Use recent trailing periods (3-6 months) rather than all-time averages.
Cohort-Based LTV Analysis
Cohort analysis provides more accurate LTV than formula-based estimates. **Method**: Track actual cumulative revenue from customer cohorts over their lifetime. Month 1 cohort: $X revenue in month 1, $Y cumulative by month 6, $Z cumulative by month 12, etc. **Cohort LTV at month N**: Average cumulative revenue per customer for customers who've been customers N+ months. **Projection**: Use curve fitting or trailing cohort patterns to project future revenue for newer cohorts. Advantages: Captures expansion, contraction, and non-linear churn patterns that simple formulas miss. Reality check: Actual cohort performance validates or disproves formula-based LTV estimates. Build cohort visualization: Matrix showing cumulative revenue by cohort age, revealing trends (are recent cohorts performing better or worse than historical?).
LTV Adjustment Factors
Refine LTV for accuracy and usefulness. **Gross margin adjustment**: LTV = Revenue LTV × Gross Margin %. A customer generating $10K revenue at 70% margin has $7K profit LTV. **Discounted LTV**: Future revenue is worth less than present revenue. Apply discount rate (typically cost of capital, 10-15%) to future revenue projections. **Segment adjustment**: Calculate separate LTV for customer segments—enterprise, mid-market, SMB have very different patterns. **Channel adjustment**: Customers from different acquisition channels may have different LTV. Organic search customers might retain better than paid acquisition. **Time adjustment**: LTV trends change. Calculate trailing 12-month LTV using recent data rather than all-time LTV that may be stale. Present LTV appropriately: Always clarify methodology—is this revenue or gross margin LTV? Formula-based or cohort-based? What time period?
The LTV Honesty Test
LTV is easy to inflate with optimistic assumptions. Honest test: Compare your formula-based LTV to actual cohort performance. If 2-year-old cohorts haven't generated revenue close to your "LTV" estimate, your calculation is optimistic. Ground LTV in actual observed customer value, not theoretical projections.
Comprehensive CAC Calculation
Complete Cost Inclusion
Include all costs that contribute to customer acquisition. **Marketing costs**: Paid advertising (all platforms), content creation and distribution, events and sponsorships, marketing tools and platforms, marketing team salaries and benefits, agency fees, brand and PR spend. **Sales costs**: Sales team salaries and benefits, commissions and bonuses, sales tools (CRM, dialers, etc.), travel and entertainment, sales operations and enablement, recruiting and training. **Often overlooked**: Founders' time on sales (especially early stage), product time spent on growth features, customer success time on pre-sale activities, partnership and business development costs. Allocation challenge: Some costs span acquisition and other activities. Establish reasonable allocation methods and apply consistently. Comprehensive inclusion matters: Understating CAC produces falsely optimistic LTV:CAC ratios. Better to over-include than under-include costs.
Period and Lag Alignment
Sales cycles create timing lag between spending and acquisition. **The lag problem**: Marketing spend in January might generate customers in March. Dividing January spend by January customers is wrong. **Alignment approaches**: Use average sales cycle to lag spend. If average cycle is 60 days, match February spend with April customers. Alternatively, use consistent longer periods (quarters) where lag effects average out. Calculate and apply your lag: Analyze time from first marketing touch to closed deal for your business. Use this to align spend and acquisition periods. **Channel-specific lags**: Paid search might have 30-day cycles; enterprise outbound might have 180-day cycles. Calculate separate CAC by channel with appropriate lags. Consistency matters: Whatever methodology you choose, apply it consistently over time to enable trend analysis.
Segmented CAC Analysis
Blended CAC obscures acquisition efficiency by segment. **Channel segmentation**: Organic (SEO, direct, referral) vs paid (ads, sponsorships) vs outbound (sales-driven). Each has very different cost structures. **Customer segment**: SMB vs mid-market vs enterprise. Enterprise sales typically have much higher CAC but also higher LTV. **Sales motion**: Self-serve (low touch, low CAC) vs sales-assisted (high touch, high CAC). Calculation by segment: Allocate costs to segments based on actual resource consumption. Sales team costs go to segments they work on; paid ads go to channels they drive. Insight value: You might find self-serve SMB CAC is $50 with 24-month LTV of $500 (10:1), while enterprise CAC is $15,000 with 60-month LTV of $50,000 (3.3:1). Both can be healthy, but aggregate CAC hides these patterns.
CAC Trend Analysis
Track CAC over time to identify efficiency changes. **Trend indicators**: Is CAC increasing, stable, or decreasing? Increasing CAC may indicate: market saturation, increased competition, channel exhaustion. Decreasing CAC may indicate: brand awareness improving, word-of-mouth growing, process efficiency gains. **Cohort CAC**: Calculate CAC for customers acquired each month/quarter. Are newer cohorts more or less expensive to acquire? **Channel efficiency curves**: Each channel typically shows diminishing returns at scale. Track marginal CAC as you scale each channel. **Competitive intelligence**: Rising CAC across the market suggests competitive pressure. Flat CAC while competitors' rises suggests advantage. Regular review: Monthly or quarterly CAC tracking enables early detection of efficiency problems and informed channel investment decisions.
The Fully-Loaded CAC Principle
When calculating CAC, include every cost that wouldn't exist if you stopped acquiring customers. If you'd fire the marketing team, cancel the ads, and stop sales commissions if acquisition stopped, those costs belong in CAC. Err on the side of inclusion for honest unit economics.
Segmented Unit Economics
Customer Segment Analysis
Calculate unit economics separately for each customer segment. **Segment definitions**: Size-based (SMB/mid-market/enterprise), industry/vertical, use case, and geography. **Per-segment metrics**: LTV, CAC, LTV:CAC ratio, payback period for each segment independently. **Common findings**: Enterprise typically has highest LTV but also highest CAC and longest payback. SMB has lowest LTV but often best LTV:CAC due to self-serve efficiency. Mid-market often has best absolute unit economics—meaningful LTV with moderate CAC. Strategic implications: If enterprise LTV:CAC is 1.5:1 while SMB is 4:1, you might question enterprise sales investment or refocus on SMB. Segment analysis informs resource allocation and strategic focus.
Channel Economics
Different acquisition channels have different economics. **Channel segmentation**: Organic search, paid search, social ads, content marketing, events, partnerships, outbound sales, referral programs. **Per-channel metrics**: CAC by channel, LTV of customers by acquisition channel (customers from different channels may retain differently). **Common patterns**: Organic typically has lowest CAC but limited scalability. Paid has predictable scaling but often highest CAC. Outbound/enterprise has high CAC but potentially high LTV. Referral often has best economics but limited volume. Investment implications: Understand marginal economics of each channel. Channels with best LTV:CAC at current scale might not maintain that as you increase investment. Plan channel mix based on economics and growth targets.
Cohort Economics
Unit economics change over time—are you improving or degrading? **Cohort analysis**: Calculate LTV, CAC, and payback for customers acquired each quarter/year. **Trend interpretation**: **Improving**: Later cohorts have better economics—product improving, efficiency gains, better targeting. **Degrading**: Later cohorts have worse economics—market saturation, product-market fit issues, competitive pressure. **Product/pricing impact**: Did specific product changes or pricing updates affect cohort economics? **Leading indicator**: Cohort economics are leading indicator of business health. Degrading cohort economics predict future business problems before they show in aggregate metrics.
Customer-Level Profitability
Beyond averages, understand profit distribution across customers. **Customer profitability calculation**: Total revenue - acquisition cost - serving costs - support costs = customer profit. **Distribution analysis**: What percentage of customers are profitable? What's the range? Are there highly unprofitable customers? **Common SaaS pattern**: Top 20% of customers often generate 80%+ of profits. Long tail of small/unprofitable customers drags average. **Actionable insights**: Which customer attributes predict profitability? Are there customers you shouldn't acquire (high CAC, low retention)? Should pricing or packaging change to improve distribution? Use customer-level analysis to refine targeting, pricing, and customer success investment.
The Segment Investment Framework
Allocate resources to segments based on unit economics. High LTV:CAC segments deserve more acquisition investment. Low LTV:CAC segments need efficiency improvement or strategic deprioritization. Don't spread resources evenly—concentrate on segments where you create most value.
Improving Unit Economics
Increasing LTV
LTV improvement comes from retention and expansion. **Retention improvement**: Every point of churn reduction extends customer lifetime. If monthly churn drops from 3% to 2%, lifetime extends from 33 to 50 months—50% LTV increase assuming constant ARPU. Strategies: Better onboarding for activation, proactive churn prevention, product improvements addressing common churn reasons, customer success investment. **ARPU expansion**: Upselling to higher tiers, cross-selling additional products, usage-based revenue growth, price increases. Strategies: Value-based pricing, expansion playbooks, product-led expansion triggers, annual plan incentives. **Combined impact**: 10% churn reduction + 10% ARPU increase can yield 20%+ LTV improvement through compounding effects.
Reducing CAC
CAC reduction improves both LTV:CAC ratio and payback period. **Channel efficiency**: Double down on high-performing channels, reduce investment in poor performers, improve conversion rates within channels. **Funnel optimization**: Improve each conversion step—visitor to lead, lead to opportunity, opportunity to customer. 10% improvement at each step compounds significantly. **Sales efficiency**: Reduce sales cycle length (faster close = same CAC spread over more customers), improve win rates, enable self-serve for appropriate segments. **Marketing efficiency**: Better targeting reduces waste, content/SEO builds compounding organic pipeline, referral programs create low-CAC acquisition. **Caution**: Don't sacrifice growth for efficiency. Very low CAC might indicate under-investment. Target efficient growth, not just efficiency.
Improving Payback Period
Faster payback accelerates growth capacity. **Payback levers**: Reduce CAC (directly reduces payback), increase ARPU (faster recovery), improve gross margin (more profit per dollar revenue). **Annual prepay incentives**: Customers paying annually provide immediate CAC recovery vs monthly payment over time. Offer discount for annual commitment—the trade-off is often worthwhile. **Higher starting plans**: If customers start on higher-value plans, payback is faster. Improve targeting and selling to start customers on appropriate (not minimal) plans. **Onboarding optimization**: Faster activation means customers reach full engagement and payment faster. **Target benchmark**: 12 months or less is ideal. Above 18 months indicates significant working capital requirements and risk.
Unit Economics Trade-offs
Optimization requires understanding trade-offs. **Growth vs efficiency**: Very efficient acquisition might be limited in scale. Sometimes higher CAC is acceptable if it unlocks larger market. **Short-term vs long-term**: Price cuts boost short-term acquisition but may harm long-term LTV through anchor effects. **Segment trade-offs**: Enterprise has longer payback but may have strategic value (case studies, stability, expansion potential) beyond pure economics. **Investment timing**: Early-stage companies may accept worse unit economics to capture market. Mature companies need sustainable economics. Strategic context: Unit economics should inform strategy, not dictate it rigidly. A segment with 2:1 LTV:CAC might be worth pursuing if it's strategic or improving. Use economics as input to decision-making, not the sole driver.
The Retention Leverage
Retention improvement is typically highest-leverage unit economics optimization. Reducing churn from 3% to 2% monthly is a 50% LTV increase with no additional CAC. Before investing in acquisition efficiency, ensure you're not churning out customers you paid to acquire. Fix the bucket before pouring in more water.
Unit Economics Analytics with QuantLedger
Automated LTV Calculation
QuantLedger calculates LTV using multiple methodologies from your Stripe data. The LTV dashboard shows: formula-based LTV using current ARPU and churn, cohort-based LTV tracking actual revenue over customer lifetime, segment-specific LTV for different customer types, and LTV trends over time. Drill down from aggregate LTV to segment breakdowns: What's enterprise LTV vs SMB? How does LTV vary by acquisition channel? Alert configuration: Set thresholds for LTV changes, segment divergence, or cohort degradation requiring investigation.
CAC Tracking and Analysis
QuantLedger tracks acquisition costs and calculates comprehensive CAC. Integration with marketing/sales spend data enables automated CAC calculation. Analysis includes: CAC by segment and channel, CAC trends over time, acquisition funnel conversion rates, and efficiency metrics. Connect marketing platform data to Stripe acquisition events for accurate attribution. Identify: Which channels deliver best CAC? Where are efficiency opportunities? How does CAC compare to benchmarks and targets?
LTV:CAC and Payback Dashboards
QuantLedger combines LTV and CAC into actionable ratio analysis. Dashboards show: LTV:CAC ratio by segment and channel, payback period tracking, margin-adjusted metrics, and benchmark comparisons. Visualization includes: Ratio trends over time, segment comparison charts, channel efficiency rankings, and cohort economics progression. Strategic views: Where should you invest more? Which segments need improvement? Are unit economics improving or degrading?
Forecasting and Optimization
QuantLedger projects future unit economics and identifies improvement opportunities. Forecasting includes: LTV projections based on retention trends, cohort economics trajectory, and impact modeling for proposed changes. Optimization insights: Which retention improvements would most impact LTV? Which CAC reductions are achievable? What's the ROI of different improvement initiatives? Connect unit economics to your broader revenue analytics for holistic business health visibility and strategic planning support.
From Quarterly Spreadsheets to Real-Time Economics
Most teams calculate unit economics quarterly in spreadsheets—stale data, error-prone, and labor-intensive. QuantLedger provides real-time unit economics that update automatically as your Stripe data changes. Catch problems early, track improvements immediately, and make decisions with current data. Connect your Stripe account to transform unit economics from periodic exercise to operational intelligence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a good LTV:CAC ratio for SaaS?
The commonly cited benchmark is 3:1—for every $1 spent on acquisition, you should generate $3 in lifetime value. However, context matters significantly. Below 3:1 may be acceptable for: early-stage companies still optimizing, enterprise segments with high expansion potential, and strategic markets worth capturing at lower efficiency. Above 5:1 might indicate under-investment in growth—you may be leaving market share on the table. The "right" ratio depends on your growth stage, capital availability, competitive dynamics, and strategic priorities. Also ensure you're comparing apples to apples: Is your LTV gross margin-adjusted? Is CAC fully loaded? Methodology consistency matters more than hitting a specific number.
How do I calculate Customer Acquisition Cost accurately?
Accurate CAC requires comprehensive cost inclusion and proper time alignment. Include all costs: marketing spend (all channels), marketing team salaries and benefits, sales team compensation (including commission), sales tools and operations, and any customer success costs for pre-sale activities. Align timing: Account for sales cycle lag—February marketing spend may generate April customers. Use your average sales cycle to align spend with acquisition periods. Segment appropriately: Calculate CAC separately for channels and customer segments rather than blending everything. Common mistakes: Excluding salary costs, ignoring sales cycle lag, and using blended CAC for decisions that should be segment-specific. When in doubt, include more costs rather than fewer—honest CAC prevents false confidence in unit economics.
Should I use gross margin-adjusted LTV?
Yes, for most purposes. Revenue LTV tells you top-line value; gross margin-adjusted LTV tells you actual profit from the customer. The formula: GM-Adjusted LTV = Revenue LTV × Gross Margin %. Why it matters: If your gross margin is 70%, a $10K revenue LTV customer generates $7K in gross profit—that's what's available to cover acquisition costs and contribute to profit. Using revenue LTV without margin adjustment inflates LTV:CAC ratios and can make unsustainable businesses look healthy. When to use revenue LTV: Some contexts (like revenue multiples for valuation) use revenue, not profit. When presenting LTV:CAC, always clarify which methodology you're using so comparisons are meaningful.
How do I improve unit economics?
Unit economics improve through three levers: increase LTV, decrease CAC, or both. Increase LTV: Improve retention (highest leverage—reducing churn from 3% to 2% monthly increases lifetime by 50%), increase ARPU through upselling/cross-selling/price increases, and extend gross margin through operational efficiency. Decrease CAC: Optimize channel mix toward higher-efficiency channels, improve funnel conversion rates, reduce sales cycle length, and invest in scalable channels like organic/SEO/referral. Combined approach: Often the best strategy addresses both—improve retention while optimizing acquisition. Focus on highest-leverage opportunities first. Warning: Don't sacrifice growth for efficiency metrics. Very low CAC might indicate under-investment that's limiting growth potential.
What is CAC payback period and why does it matter?
CAC payback period is the time required to recover acquisition cost from customer revenue. Formula: CAC Payback = CAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin). Result is in months. Why it matters: Payback determines capital efficiency and growth capacity. Short payback (12 months) means you recover acquisition investment quickly and can reinvest in more growth. Long payback (24+ months) ties up capital, requires external funding, and increases risk if customers churn before payback. Benchmarks: <12 months is excellent, 12-18 months is good, 18-24 months is acceptable for enterprise, >24 months is concerning unless LTV is very high. Trade-off consideration: Sometimes accepting longer payback is strategic—enterprise customers with long payback may have strategic value beyond pure economics.
How often should I calculate unit economics?
Track unit economics monthly, with deeper analysis quarterly. Monthly: Calculate current LTV, CAC, ratio, and payback using trailing periods. Monitor for significant changes. Quarterly: Deep dive into segment analysis, cohort progression, channel economics, and trend analysis. Compare to targets and previous quarters. Annually: Comprehensive review including benchmark comparison, methodology validation, and strategic implications. Real-time where possible: Modern analytics tools can calculate unit economics continuously. Real-time visibility catches problems early and enables faster response. The key is consistency: Whatever frequency you choose, maintain consistent methodology so you can track trends over time. Changing calculation methods makes historical comparison difficult.
Key Takeaways
Unit economics determine whether your SaaS business is building value or burning capital. Companies with strong unit economics—high LTV, efficient CAC, reasonable payback—can grow sustainably and generate profits. Companies with weak unit economics are running on borrowed time, dependent on continuous funding to survive. Master the fundamentals: Understand LTV calculation methodologies and which is appropriate for your context. Calculate CAC comprehensively, including all costs and proper time alignment. Track LTV:CAC ratio and payback period as your north star efficiency metrics. Then segment for insight: Aggregate metrics hide the truth. Break down unit economics by customer segment, acquisition channel, and cohort to understand where you create value and where you destroy it. Finally, optimize systematically: Use the levers—retention improvement, ARPU expansion, channel efficiency, conversion optimization—to continuously improve your fundamental business model. QuantLedger provides automated unit economics analytics from your Stripe data, replacing quarterly spreadsheet exercises with real-time visibility into customer-level profitability and segment economics. Connect your Stripe account to understand whether each customer you acquire creates or destroys value.
Master Unit Economics
Calculate LTV, CAC, and profitability automatically
Related Articles
LTV Calculation Guide 2025: Customer Lifetime Value Formula
Calculate LTV from Stripe data: customer lifetime value formula, ARPU × customer lifespan method, and cohort-based LTV. Optimize LTV:CAC ratio.
LTV:CAC Ratio Calculator & Benchmarks 2025: SaaS Unit Economics Guide
Calculate your LTV:CAC ratio with our free calculator. 2025 benchmarks (3:1 gold standard), formulas, and strategies to optimize SaaS unit economics for growth.
SaaS Metrics Benchmarks 2025: Compare Your Stripe Performance
Benchmark SaaS metrics against industry standards: MRR growth, churn rate, LTV:CAC ratio, and NRR benchmarks. See how your Stripe data compares.