Back to Blog
Payment Recovery
17 min read

Dunning Software Comparison 2025: Chargebee vs Recurly vs Stripe

Compare top dunning management tools: Chargebee Retention, Recurly, Stripe Billing, Gravy, and more. Features, pricing, and recovery rate benchmarks.

Published: June 23, 2025Updated: December 28, 2025By Ben Callahan
Payment processing and billing management
BC

Ben Callahan

Financial Operations Lead

Ben specializes in financial operations and reporting for subscription businesses, with deep expertise in revenue recognition and compliance.

Financial Operations
Revenue Recognition
Compliance
11+ years in Finance

Choosing the right dunning management software can mean the difference between recovering 15% and 50% of failed payments—a gap that translates to hundreds of thousands of dollars annually for mid-market SaaS companies. According to ProfitWell's 2024 State of Subscription Payments, companies using specialized dunning tools recover 67% more revenue than those relying on payment processor defaults, yet 43% of SaaS companies still use only their billing system's basic retry logic. The dunning software landscape in 2025 spans multiple categories: subscription billing platforms with built-in dunning (Chargebee, Recurly), payment processors with recovery features (Stripe Billing), specialized dunning tools (Gravy, Churn Buster), and AI-powered solutions claiming intelligent retry optimization. Each approaches the problem differently, with varying levels of customization, automation sophistication, and integration requirements. The right choice depends on your billing infrastructure, customer segments, payment volumes, and in-house capabilities. A startup processing $50K/month through Stripe has different needs than an enterprise with $5M/month across multiple payment processors and currencies. This comprehensive comparison evaluates the leading dunning solutions across every dimension that matters: recovery effectiveness, customization depth, integration flexibility, pricing models, and operational requirements. Whether you're evaluating your first dedicated dunning solution or considering a switch from your current platform, this guide provides the framework for an informed decision.

Dunning Software Categories

Before comparing specific tools, understand the different categories of dunning solutions and their fundamental approaches.

Subscription Billing Platforms

Full-featured billing platforms with integrated dunning: Chargebee—comprehensive subscription management with Chargebee Retention (formerly Brightback) for dunning and churn prevention. Strong customization, good for mid-market. Recurly—subscription-first platform with sophisticated dunning built in. Revenue optimization engine uses ML for retry timing. Strong in media/publishing verticals. Zuora—enterprise-grade subscription platform with dunning as part of broader revenue operations. Complex, powerful, expensive. Best for large enterprises with complex billing. Maxio (formerly SaaSOptics + Chargify)—combines subscription billing with financial operations. Solid dunning for B2B SaaS companies needing revenue recognition integration. These platforms offer dunning as part of a larger solution. If you're already on one of these platforms, using their native dunning is often the path of least resistance.

Payment Processor Native Tools

Dunning features built into payment processors: Stripe Billing—Smart Retries automatically optimizes retry timing using Stripe's network intelligence. Limited customization but effective for Stripe-only businesses. Stripe Revenue Recovery adds email capabilities. Braintree/PayPal—basic retry logic with limited customization. Adequate for simple cases but lacks sophistication for complex recovery needs. Adyen—enterprise payment processor with retry optimization. Better for high-volume, multi-region businesses. Limited for subscription-specific dunning. Square—basic retry and notification capabilities. Best for simple, primarily in-person businesses expanding to subscriptions. Native tools benefit from payment network data but typically offer less customization than specialized solutions.

Specialized Dunning Tools

Dedicated tools focused exclusively on payment recovery: Churn Buster—purpose-built for SaaS dunning. Email campaigns, payment update pages, analytics dashboard. Integrates with major billing platforms. Gravy—human-powered recovery using trained specialists who contact customers directly. Higher recovery rates but higher cost. Best for high-value B2B transactions. Stunning—Stripe-focused dunning with smart retry timing and customizable email sequences. Simple, effective, reasonably priced. Baremetrics Recover—dunning add-on to the analytics platform. Good if you're already using Baremetrics; limited as standalone. Specialized tools often achieve better results than native solutions because recovery is their entire focus—but require integration work.

AI-Powered Solutions

Emerging category using machine learning for optimization: Butter Payments—ML-optimized retry timing claiming 5-10% improvement over standard approaches. Integrates with Stripe and Braintree. FlexPay—AI for decline recovery across any payment processor. Strong in e-commerce and subscription boxes. Pagos—payment intelligence platform with retry optimization as one capability. Best for enterprises wanting broad payment analytics. AI solutions promise better results through pattern recognition but require sufficient transaction volume for ML to be meaningful. Typically need 10,000+ transactions monthly to see benefits over rule-based approaches.

Category Selection

Start with your existing billing infrastructure. If you're committed to a subscription platform, use their native dunning first. Only evaluate specialized or AI tools if native solutions underperform or lack needed features.

Feature Comparison Matrix

Key features that differentiate dunning solutions and their importance for different business types.

Retry Logic Sophistication

How intelligently the system retries failed payments: Stripe Smart Retries—uses ML across Stripe's network to optimize timing. Reports 10-15% better recovery than fixed schedules. Works automatically, limited customization. Chargebee—configurable retry schedules with segment-based rules. Can set different schedules for different customer types. Manual configuration required. Recurly Revenue Optimization—ML-powered timing plus payment method diversification. Suggests optimal retry based on decline code and customer history. Churn Buster—rule-based with recommended templates. Less sophisticated than ML approaches but highly customizable. Gravy—human judgment replaces automated retry. Specialists evaluate each case and determine best approach. Evaluation: ML-powered retry (Stripe, Recurly) edges out rule-based approaches for most businesses. The difference is typically 5-10% better recovery rates.

Communication Capabilities

How the system communicates with customers about failed payments: Chargebee Retention—full email and in-app messaging with extensive customization. Segment-based communication, A/B testing, analytics. Churn Buster—sophisticated email sequences with merge tags, delays, and conditional logic. Strong template library and customization. Stripe Revenue Recovery—basic email templates with limited customization. Adequate for simple needs, frustrating for complex requirements. Recurly—email campaigns with good customization. Recently improved but historically behind Chargebee. Gravy—human-written personalized communications. Most effective but doesn't scale and costs more. Evaluation: Chargebee and Churn Buster lead for automated communication. Gravy leads for human-touch recovery.

Payment Update Experience

How customers update failed payment methods: Stripe—hosted payment page with Card Element. Simple, secure, mobile-optimized. Limited branding options. Chargebee—hosted pages with significant customization. Can match your brand closely. Recurly—similar to Chargebee with good customization. Embedded and hosted options. Churn Buster—creates optimized payment update pages that integrate with your billing system. Strong focus on conversion optimization. Gravy—specialists guide customers through updates, often over phone. Highest conversion but highest cost. Evaluation: Dedicated tools (Churn Buster) often outperform platform-native pages because payment update UX is their focus.

Analytics and Reporting

Visibility into recovery performance: Baremetrics Recover—strongest analytics (unsurprisingly, given Baremetrics' focus). Cohort analysis, recovery rate trends, revenue impact. Chargebee—comprehensive dashboards with segment breakdowns. Good for understanding what's working. Stripe—basic recovery metrics in dashboard. Adequate for monitoring, limited for optimization. Churn Buster—solid analytics focused on email performance and recovery rates. Actionable for improving campaigns. Recurly—good reporting with revenue attribution. Clear understanding of dunning's financial impact. Evaluation: Baremetrics leads for pure analytics; Chargebee best combines recovery capabilities with reporting.

Feature Priorities

Prioritize features based on your recovery bottleneck. If retries are failing, focus on retry sophistication. If customers aren't responding, focus on communication. If they respond but don't update, focus on payment page UX.

Platform Deep Dives

Detailed analysis of the most popular dunning solutions with specific strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases.

Chargebee + Chargebee Retention

Overview: Full subscription billing platform with sophisticated dunning via Chargebee Retention acquisition. Strengths: Comprehensive feature set covering the entire subscription lifecycle. Excellent customization for segment-based dunning. Strong integrations with CRMs and support tools. Retention module adds cancel flow optimization. Weaknesses: Can be complex to configure optimally. Pricing scales with transaction volume—can become expensive. Overkill if you only need dunning, not full billing. Pricing: Billing starts at $599/month for Launch plan. Retention is separate pricing based on customer volume. Best for: Mid-market SaaS ($1M-50M ARR) wanting unified billing and dunning with extensive customization. Recovery benchmark: Customers report 25-35% recovery rates with optimized configuration.

Stripe Billing + Revenue Recovery

Overview: Native dunning within Stripe's ecosystem. Smart Retries for automated optimization, Revenue Recovery for email campaigns. Strengths: Seamless integration—no additional vendor. Smart Retries leverage Stripe's network intelligence automatically. Simple to enable and maintain. Cost-effective for Stripe-only businesses. Weaknesses: Limited customization compared to dedicated tools. Email templates are basic. No segment-based differentiation in automated flows. Only works with Stripe payments. Pricing: Smart Retries included with Stripe. Revenue Recovery is 0.4% of recovered revenue (capped at $10 per recovered subscription). Best for: Startups and SMBs using Stripe exclusively who want "good enough" dunning without complexity. Recovery benchmark: Smart Retries claim 38% improvement over standard retry schedules; overall recovery rates similar to industry averages (20-30%).

Recurly Revenue Optimization

Overview: Subscription platform with ML-powered retry and communication optimization. Strengths: Machine learning optimizes retry timing continuously. Good balance of automation and customization. Strong in media/entertainment and subscription box verticals. Gateway-agnostic if using Recurly for billing. Weaknesses: Less flexible than Chargebee for complex segment logic. Analytics improving but historically behind competitors. Must use Recurly for billing to use their dunning. Pricing: Included with Recurly billing. Billing pricing based on revenue processed (typically 0.9-1.25% + per-transaction fees). Best for: Media, publishing, and subscription box companies wanting ML optimization without extensive customization requirements. Recovery benchmark: Reports 10-15% improvement over static retry schedules; overall recovery rates of 25-40% depending on vertical.

Churn Buster

Overview: Specialized dunning tool focused on email campaigns and payment update optimization. Integrates with Stripe, Braintree, Chargebee, Recurly. Strengths: Exceptional email campaign builder with conditional logic. Payment update pages optimized for conversion. Platform-agnostic—works with multiple billing systems. Strong customer support and onboarding. Weaknesses: No ML-powered retry optimization—relies on rule-based schedules. Additional vendor and cost on top of billing platform. Requires integration work, though well-documented. Pricing: Starts at $99/month for basic; scales to $500+/month for advanced features and volume. Best for: Companies wanting best-in-class email dunning regardless of billing platform. Good for those frustrated with native tool limitations. Recovery benchmark: Claims customers recover 3x more than with native Stripe emails. Typical recovery rates 30-45% for well-optimized campaigns.

Platform Lock-In

Consider lock-in implications. Choosing a billing platform's native dunning ties recovery to that platform. Specialized tools maintain flexibility but add integration complexity.

Pricing Models and ROI

Understanding the true cost of dunning solutions and calculating return on investment.

Pricing Model Types

Dunning tools use various pricing approaches: Flat monthly fee—Churn Buster, Stunning. Predictable costs regardless of volume. Good for budgeting but may be expensive at low volumes or cheap at high volumes. Percentage of recovered revenue—Stripe Revenue Recovery (0.4%), Gravy (typically 10-25%). Aligns cost with value but unpredictable and can become expensive at scale. Per-customer pricing—some tools charge based on customer count. Predictable but not directly tied to recovery value. Bundled with billing—Chargebee, Recurly include dunning in billing pricing. Hard to isolate dunning cost but no incremental expense if already on the platform. Evaluate total cost at your current and projected volumes. A tool that's cheap today might be expensive at 3x scale.

ROI Calculation Framework

Calculate dunning tool ROI: Step 1—Quantify your involuntary churn. If 5% of customers experience payment failures monthly and 50% of those churn (2.5% involuntary churn), you have your baseline. Step 2—Estimate recovery improvement. If current recovery is 20% and new tool achieves 35%, that's 15% improvement (from 2.5% churn to 2.125% churn). Step 3—Value the prevented churn. 0.375% of MRR saved monthly × 12 = 4.5% ARR. At $1M ARR, that's $45,000/year. Step 4—Subtract tool cost. If tool costs $6,000/year, net ROI is $39,000 (7.5x return). Most companies underestimate dunning ROI because involuntary churn is invisible—customers just disappear without cancelling.

Hidden Costs

Consider costs beyond subscription fees: Integration effort—specialized tools require development time to integrate. Budget 20-40 hours for typical integrations. Ongoing maintenance—integrations break, APIs change, configurations need updates. Budget 2-4 hours monthly for maintenance. Opportunity cost—time spent configuring and optimizing dunning is time not spent on other priorities. Analytics tools—some solutions require additional analytics for proper measurement. May need Baremetrics, ChartMogul, or similar. Training—team members need to understand the tool. Factor in onboarding and ongoing learning. For small teams, "simple but adequate" often beats "powerful but complex" because of these hidden costs.

Cost Optimization Strategies

Maximize dunning ROI: Start with native tools—use Stripe Smart Retries or billing platform dunning before adding specialized tools. Often sufficient for early-stage. Negotiate volume pricing—at scale, negotiate custom pricing. Percentage-based models especially have room for negotiation. Evaluate annually—as volumes change, the optimal tool may change. A tool that was cost-effective at $100K MRR may not be at $1M. Consider hybrid approaches—use native retry optimization but specialized email tools. May get best of both without full platform cost. Kill underperforming channels—if phone recovery costs more than it recovers, stop. Focus investment on channels with positive ROI.

ROI Validation

Run controlled tests before committing. Most dunning tools offer trials. Test on a segment of customers and measure actual recovery improvement before enterprise-wide deployment.

Integration Requirements

Technical considerations for implementing dunning solutions within your existing infrastructure.

Billing Platform Integrations

How dunning tools connect to billing systems: Native integrations (Stripe, Chargebee, Recurly, Braintree)—most dunning tools support these natively. Setup typically takes hours, not days. API documentation is good. Custom/legacy billing—if you have custom billing, integration is harder. May need to build webhook handlers and API connections. Budget weeks, not days. Multi-platform—if you use multiple billing systems (e.g., Stripe for SMB, custom for enterprise), ensure dunning tool supports both or plan for multiple solutions. Real-time vs batch—some integrations sync real-time; others batch daily. Real-time is better for responsive dunning but harder to implement.

Data Flow Architecture

Design data flows for effective dunning: Payment failures—billing system must notify dunning tool immediately. Webhook reliability is critical—missed webhooks mean missed recovery opportunities. Customer data—dunning needs customer context (tenure, value, engagement) for personalization. Plan how this data reaches the dunning system. Recovery events—dunning outcomes must flow back to billing and analytics. Track recovered revenue, churn despite dunning, and channel attribution. Communication preferences—respect customer communication preferences. Integrate with preference management systems. Single source of truth—avoid conflicting recovery efforts. If multiple systems can trigger recovery emails, you'll annoy customers and skew metrics.

Security and Compliance

Dunning involves sensitive payment data: PCI compliance—ensure dunning tool handles payment data compliantly. Most modern tools are PCI compliant, but verify certifications. Data residency—for GDPR and other regulations, understand where data is stored and processed. EU customers may require EU data residency. Access controls—limit who can access dunning configurations and customer payment data. Audit logging matters. Payment method handling—how does the tool handle payment method updates? Direct card input requires PCI scope; tokenized approaches reduce compliance burden. Vendor security assessment—dunning tools have access to payment infrastructure. Conduct security reviews before granting access.

Implementation Timeline

Realistic timelines for dunning implementations: Native Stripe Smart Retries—hours to enable. Minimal configuration required. Subscription platform dunning—days to configure optimally. Basic setup is quick; segment-specific optimization takes longer. Specialized tools (Churn Buster)—1-2 weeks for full implementation including integration, customization, and testing. Enterprise platforms (Zuora)—2-4 weeks minimum. Complex configurations and enterprise processes extend timelines. Custom integrations—4-8 weeks or more depending on complexity. Budget for edge cases and testing. Plan for iteration—initial configuration is just the start. Expect 2-3 months of optimization to achieve full potential.

Integration Quality

A tool's integration quality often matters more than its feature list. Well-integrated simple tool beats poorly-integrated sophisticated tool. Ask vendors for integration references at your billing platform.

Selection Framework

A structured approach to evaluating and selecting the right dunning solution for your business.

Assessment Questions

Answer these questions before evaluating tools: 1. What's your billing infrastructure? (Stripe-only, subscription platform, custom) 2. What's your involuntary churn rate and MRR impact? 3. How sophisticated are your current dunning efforts? 4. What's your technical capacity for integration and maintenance? 5. What customer segments exist and how should dunning differ? 6. What's your budget for dunning tools and implementation? 7. What recovery rate improvement would justify investment? Answers inform which category of tool makes sense and what features matter most.

Evaluation Criteria

Weight criteria based on your situation: Recovery effectiveness (high weight)—ultimately, what matters is whether the tool recovers more payments. Ask for benchmark data from similar customers. Integration fit (high weight)—poor integration undermines everything else. Prioritize tools with proven integrations to your billing platform. Customization depth (medium weight)—important if you have distinct customer segments. Less important for homogeneous customer bases. Operational simplicity (medium weight)—tools requiring constant attention may not get attention. Consider team capacity. Pricing alignment (medium weight)—ensure pricing scales appropriately with your growth trajectory. Analytics quality (lower weight)—nice to have but you can supplement with external analytics if needed.

Vendor Evaluation Process

Structure your evaluation: 1. Shortlist—narrow to 2-3 options based on category fit and integration requirements. 2. Demo deep-dives—go beyond marketing demos. Ask to see specific workflows, edge case handling, and actual customer dashboards. 3. Reference calls—speak with customers similar to you. Ask about implementation challenges, actual recovery improvements, and support quality. 4. Trial period—most tools offer trials. Run controlled tests measuring actual recovery improvement vs current approach. 5. Security review—conduct appropriate due diligence on data handling and security practices. 6. Contract negotiation—understand pricing at scale, SLAs, and terms for switching away.

Decision Framework

Recommendations by business type: Startups (<$1M ARR) using Stripe—Start with Smart Retries and basic email dunning. Add specialized tools only if recovery is clearly underperforming. Growth companies ($1-10M ARR)—evaluate specialized tools (Churn Buster) or subscription platforms (Chargebee) based on current billing stack. Investment in dunning typically pays off at this stage. Established businesses ($10M+ ARR)—full-featured subscription platform dunning or enterprise solutions (Zuora). Customization and analytics capabilities matter more at scale. High-value B2B—consider human-powered recovery (Gravy) for high-ACV customers where relationship matters more than automation efficiency.

Avoid Over-Engineering

The best dunning solution is one you'll actually maintain. A simple, well-maintained setup outperforms a sophisticated, neglected one. Choose based on your team's capacity, not just the tool's capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I use my payment processor's native dunning or a specialized tool?

Start with native (Stripe Smart Retries) and measure results. If recovery rates are below 25-30% after optimization, or if you need segment-specific approaches your native tool doesn't support, evaluate specialized options. Native tools have the advantage of simplicity and payment network intelligence. Specialized tools offer more customization and often better email capabilities. The right choice depends on your volumes, segments, and team capacity.

What recovery rate should I expect from dunning software?

Industry benchmarks: Basic/no dunning recovers 10-15%. Native processor tools achieve 20-30%. Optimized specialized tools achieve 30-45%. Human-powered recovery can exceed 50% but at higher cost. Your actual rates depend on your customer base (B2B typically higher than B2C), payment methods (ACH fails differently than cards), and failure reasons (soft declines recover better than hard declines).

How long does it take to see results from new dunning software?

Initial results appear within the first billing cycle (typically 30 days) as the tool processes new payment failures. Full impact takes 2-3 months as you optimize configurations, test messaging, and the tool learns (for ML-based solutions). Don't judge a tool by first-month results—give it time to optimize while you refine your approach.

Can I use multiple dunning tools together?

Yes, but carefully. A common pattern: use payment processor retry optimization (Stripe Smart Retries) for automated retry timing, plus specialized tool (Churn Buster) for email campaigns. This combines network intelligence with email sophistication. However, ensure tools don't conflict—duplicate emails or retry conflicts hurt recovery. Design clear boundaries for each tool's responsibility.

What's the implementation effort for dunning tools?

Enabling native tools (Stripe Smart Retries): 1-2 hours. Configuring subscription platform dunning: 2-5 days. Integrating specialized tools: 1-2 weeks for standard integrations, longer for custom billing. Enterprise implementations: 4-8 weeks minimum. Factor in ongoing optimization time—initial setup is just the start. Plan for 2-4 hours monthly for maintenance and improvement.

How do I measure whether my dunning tool is working?

Key metrics: Recovery rate (percent of failed payments eventually collected), time to recovery (days from failure to successful payment), recovered revenue (absolute dollars saved), involuntary churn rate (did overall involuntary churn decrease?), and recovery rate by segment. Compare before/after implementation, ideally with a control group. Some tools provide benchmarking against their customer base, which helps contextualize your performance.

Key Takeaways

Dunning software selection matters more than most SaaS operators realize—the difference between basic and sophisticated dunning can be 2-3x in recovery rates, translating to significant revenue retention. The market offers options across a spectrum: native payment processor tools for simplicity, subscription platform dunning for integrated management, specialized tools for maximum customization, and human-powered recovery for high-value scenarios. Start by understanding your current involuntary churn impact and recovery rates. If you don't know these numbers, that's your first task—you can't improve what you don't measure. Then evaluate options based on your billing infrastructure, customer segments, technical capacity, and budget. For most companies, the path is: start with native tools, measure results, and upgrade only when results justify investment or needs exceed native capabilities. Avoid the trap of over-engineering—a well-maintained simple solution beats a neglected sophisticated one. Whatever you choose, remember that dunning is an ongoing discipline, not a one-time implementation. Continuous optimization—testing email copy, refining retry schedules, improving payment update flows—compounds into significant recovery improvements over time. The best dunning tool is one you'll actually use and improve. Choose accordingly.

Transform Your Revenue Analytics

Get ML-powered insights for better business decisions

Related Articles

Explore More Topics